COVID-19: The Role of the Ophthalmologist in ICU.

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has had a devastating impact on patient lives. COVID-19 impacts the respiratory system and this leads to acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), which increases the likelihood of intensive care unit (ICU) admission. Patients admitted to ICU are at increased risk of developing ophthalmological complications due to the systemic effects of COVID-19 along with the side effects of the mechanical ventilators and the regular proning that patients are exposed to. This article presents an overview of sight-impairing ophthalmic conditions seen in COVID-19 patients admitted to ICU admissions. The article provides a brief commentary on the clinical signs and examinations that intensive care nurses and doctors have to be vigilant of before escalating the patient care to the Ophthalmic team.

Task shifting of intraocular injections from physicians to nurses: a randomized single-masked noninferiority study.

PURPOSE: To test if task shifting of intraocular injections to nurses in a real-world setting can result in similar visual function outcome with equal safety profile. METHOD: All patients with either age-related macular degeneration, retinal vein occlusion or diabetic macular oedema remitted to intraocular injections at a tertiary ophthalmology department in Norway between March 2015 and May 2017, were asked to participate. The participants were randomized to either nurse- or physician-administered intraocular injections of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor. The primary outcome measure was change in best-corrected visual acuity from baseline to 1-year follow-up. The mean difference in the primary outcome between the groups was analysed by a noninferiority test with a margin of three letters in disfavour of the nurse group. Adverse events were recorded. RESULTS: Three hundred and forty-two patients entered the study. Two hundred and fifty-nine completed the 1-year follow-up and were included in the study sample for the analysis of the primary outcome. Nurse-administered intraocular injections were noninferior to physician-administered injections with 0.7 and 1.6 letters gained, respectively (95% CI of the mean difference, -2.9 to 1.0; p = 0.019, one-sided t-test). Two thousand and seventy-seven injections and three ocular adverse events were recorded. CONCLUSION: Task shifting of intraocular injections to nurses can be performed without increased risk to visual function. Such a task shift can alleviate the burden of performing intraocular injections in ophthalmology departments. To our knowledge, this is the first RCT on task shifting of a surgical procedure from physicians to nurses in a high-income country.

Ophthalmic manifestations in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: A review.

Clinical manifestations of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are not locally restricted to the gastrointestinal tract, and a significant portion of patients have involvement of other organs and systems. The visual system is one of the most frequently affected, mainly by inflammatory disorders such as episcleritis, uveitis and scleritis. A critical review of available literature concerning ocular involvement in IBD, as it appears in PubMed, was performed. Episcleritis, the most common ocular extraintestinal manifestation (EIM), seems to be more associated with IBD activity when compared with other ocular EIMs. In IBD patients, anterior uveitis has an insidious onset, it is longstanding and bilateral, and not related to the intestinal disease activity. Systemic steroids or immunosuppressants may be necessary in severe ocular inflammation cases, and control of the underlying bowel disease is important to prevent recurrence. Our review revealed that ocular involvement is more prevalent in Crohn's disease than ulcerative colitis, in active IBD, mainly in the presence of other EIMs. The ophthalmic symptoms in IBD are mainly non-specific and their relevance may not be recognized by the clinician; most ophthalmic manifestations are treatable, and resolve without sequel upon prompt treatment. A collaborative clinical care team for management of IBD that includes ophthalmologists is central for improvement of quality care for these patients, and it is also cost-effective.

Analysis of a Physician-led, Team-based Care Model for the Treatment of Glaucoma.

PURPOSE: To determine the effect of a protocol for a new physician-led, team-based glaucoma care model implemented in 2008 at Mayo Clinic's campus in Rochester, Minnesota (MCR), to increase conformance with the American Academy of Ophthalmology (AAO) Preferred Practice Pattern guidelines for treatment of primary open-angle glaucoma. METHODS: Records of 591 patients with newly diagnosed glaucoma were assessed retrospectively for the completion of 9 AAO Preferred Practice Pattern recommended metrics including measured corneal thickness, intraocular pressure (IOP), cup to disk ratio, visual acuity, recorded IOP target, gonioscopy, fundus photos, ocular coherence tomography, and visual field in the 3 years before and 3 years after protocol implementation. Treatment by the glaucoma care team at MCR was compared with treatment at a community-based general ophthalmology practice and with a group of comprehensive ophthalmologists at MCR without team care, which served as controls. RESULTS: Adherence to AAO recommendations increased for the documentation of target IOP (+24%, 42.6% to 66.7%; P=0.007), gonioscopy (+27%, 66.7% to 93.3%; P≤0.001), fundus photos (+29%, 44.4% to 73.3%; P≤0.001), and ocular coherence tomography (+20%, 48.1% to 68.0%; P=0.02) after protocol initiation. No change in pattern of testing occurred in the control groups without team care during the same time period. Type and severity of glaucoma were similar between MCR and community practice. CONCLUSIONS: An increase in compliance with AAO guidelines was found after implementation of our protocol for a physician-led, team-based care model to standardize glaucoma care among providers.